Half a Primer on Moral Turpitude Analysis

In Cerezo v. Mukasey, case no. 05-74688 (9th Cir. Jan. 14, 2008), the issue before the court is

whether a violation of California Vehicle Code § 20001(a) (leaving the scene of an accident resulting in bodily injury or death) is categorically a crime involving moral turpitude for purposes of 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(ii).

In concluding it is not, the court walks the reader through the standards for a “categorical approach” to analysis of the issue. When a court fails to find moral turpitude through the categorical approach, its next step is to examine the issue under the “modified categorical” approach. Unfortunately, the court has to cut its modified categorical analysis short because of the state of the record.

Hence, the case is only half a primer.

Bookmark and Share

There are no comments yet. Be the first and leave a response!

Leave a Reply


Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Trackback URL http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/01/14/half-a-primer-on-moral-turpitude-analysis/trackback/
Blog Proprietor
Click on the logo below or on the link in the navigation bar for more information about:

This blog is brought to you exclusively by attorney Greg May. The information offered here is provided as commentary only. It is not legal advice and should not be relied on as such.

View Greg May's profile on LinkedIn

Follow gregmay on Twitter