<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;There is no exception for Supreme Court cases of ancient vintage.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2009/01/07/there-is-no-exception-for-supreme-court-cases-of-ancient-vintage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2009/01/07/there-is-no-exception-for-supreme-court-cases-of-ancient-vintage/</link>
	<description>Appellate Attorney Greg May on Practice and Developments in the Appellate Courts of California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:25:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Published Supersedeas Case. Really! &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2009/01/07/there-is-no-exception-for-supreme-court-cases-of-ancient-vintage/comment-page-1/#comment-5539</link>
		<dc:creator>A Published Supersedeas Case. Really! &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/?p=1353#comment-5539</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;There is no exception for Supreme Court cases of ancient vintage.&#8221;  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;There is no exception for Supreme Court cases of ancient vintage.&#8221;  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Rosen</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2009/01/07/there-is-no-exception-for-supreme-court-cases-of-ancient-vintage/comment-page-1/#comment-5529</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Rosen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 02:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/?p=1353#comment-5529</guid>
		<description>The reason for old cases dominating supersedeas is that when a supersedeas writ is denied it is done so by unpublished order and even when granted, the appellate court also do so with an unpublished order.  This occurs because no oral argument need be heard before deciding a writ of supersedeas.  Moreover, even in the rare case where there is oral argument on a supersedeas writ, the Court of Appeal will still simply issue an unpublished order granting or denying the writ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason for old cases dominating supersedeas is that when a supersedeas writ is denied it is done so by unpublished order and even when granted, the appellate court also do so with an unpublished order.  This occurs because no oral argument need be heard before deciding a writ of supersedeas.  Moreover, even in the rare case where there is oral argument on a supersedeas writ, the Court of Appeal will still simply issue an unpublished order granting or denying the writ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

