<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Some Lawyers and Their Clients are Reluctant to Engage Appellate Counsel, Part 2: &#8220;It&#8217;s Just Litigation.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/09/23/why-some-lawyers-and-their-clients-are-reluctant-to-engage-appellate-counsel-part-2-its-just-litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/09/23/why-some-lawyers-and-their-clients-are-reluctant-to-engage-appellate-counsel-part-2-its-just-litigation/</link>
	<description>Appellate Attorney Greg May on Practice and Developments in the Appellate Courts of California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:25:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg May</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/09/23/why-some-lawyers-and-their-clients-are-reluctant-to-engage-appellate-counsel-part-2-its-just-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-5287</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 19:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/?p=1139#comment-5287</guid>
		<description>Todd,

No doubt about it, those are the &quot;Big 3.&quot; 

You&#039;ll notice as the series progresses that I am tackling them in smaller chunks.  The above post really covers just one facet of your #1.  Next week&#039;s installment will cover another facet of your #1: the trial lawyer&#039;s sense that the case requires an expert in the substantive area of the law at issue.

As you probably already know, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calblogofappeal.com/wp-admin/post.php?action=edit&amp;post=1102&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;this week&#039;s post&lt;/a&gt; is related to your #3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd,</p>
<p>No doubt about it, those are the &#8220;Big 3.&#8221; </p>
<p>You&#8217;ll notice as the series progresses that I am tackling them in smaller chunks.  The above post really covers just one facet of your #1.  Next week&#8217;s installment will cover another facet of your #1: the trial lawyer&#8217;s sense that the case requires an expert in the substantive area of the law at issue.</p>
<p>As you probably already know, <a href="http://www.calblogofappeal.com/wp-admin/post.php?action=edit&amp;post=1102" target="_blank">this week&#8217;s post</a> is related to your #3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Todd Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/09/23/why-some-lawyers-and-their-clients-are-reluctant-to-engage-appellate-counsel-part-2-its-just-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-5285</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Todd Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/?p=1139#comment-5285</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to add something to the discussion,   In my view, an appellate specialist brings three things to the table that trial lawyers and their counsel don&#039;t always appreciate fully:

1.  knowledge of and familiarity with the appellate-court system, rules, and players;
  
2.  special training and skill in the art of written and oral appellate advocacy; and
  
3.  a dispassionate, neutral viewpoint helpful to an honest evaluation of the case.

These factors can add tremendous value and, when the outcome could go either way, bolster the chances of success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to add something to the discussion,   In my view, an appellate specialist brings three things to the table that trial lawyers and their counsel don&#8217;t always appreciate fully:</p>
<p>1.  knowledge of and familiarity with the appellate-court system, rules, and players;</p>
<p>2.  special training and skill in the art of written and oral appellate advocacy; and</p>
<p>3.  a dispassionate, neutral viewpoint helpful to an honest evaluation of the case.</p>
<p>These factors can add tremendous value and, when the outcome could go either way, bolster the chances of success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Some Lawyers and Their Clients are Reluctant to Engage Appellate Counsel, Part 3: &#8220;No one knows the case better than I do.&#8221; &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/09/23/why-some-lawyers-and-their-clients-are-reluctant-to-engage-appellate-counsel-part-2-its-just-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-5279</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Some Lawyers and Their Clients are Reluctant to Engage Appellate Counsel, Part 3: &#8220;No one knows the case better than I do.&#8221; &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 15:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/?p=1139#comment-5279</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Some Lawyers and Their Clients are Reluctant to Engage Appellate Counsel, Part 2: &#8220;It&amp;#821... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Some Lawyers and Their Clients are Reluctant to Engage Appellate Counsel, Part 2: &#8220;It&amp;#821&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Double Standard . . . of Review &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/09/23/why-some-lawyers-and-their-clients-are-reluctant-to-engage-appellate-counsel-part-2-its-just-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-5254</link>
		<dc:creator>A Double Standard . . . of Review &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/?p=1139#comment-5254</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Some Lawyers and Their Clients are Reluctant to Engage Appellate Counsel, Part 2: &#8220;It&amp;#821... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Some Lawyers and Their Clients are Reluctant to Engage Appellate Counsel, Part 2: &#8220;It&amp;#821&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buffalo New York Lawyers</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/09/23/why-some-lawyers-and-their-clients-are-reluctant-to-engage-appellate-counsel-part-2-its-just-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-5251</link>
		<dc:creator>Buffalo New York Lawyers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/?p=1139#comment-5251</guid>
		<description>As a partner in a general practice firm, I can attest to your statement that &quot;Clients almost always want a specialist when one is available&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a partner in a general practice firm, I can attest to your statement that &#8220;Clients almost always want a specialist when one is available&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klerk</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/09/23/why-some-lawyers-and-their-clients-are-reluctant-to-engage-appellate-counsel-part-2-its-just-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-5246</link>
		<dc:creator>klerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 03:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/?p=1139#comment-5246</guid>
		<description>The Ninth Circuit makes a standards of review outline publically available &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/Documents.nsf/174376a6245fda7888256ce5007d5470/764499fa873462aa88256af5007335d6?OpenDocument&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Ninth Circuit makes a standards of review outline publically available <a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/Documents.nsf/174376a6245fda7888256ce5007d5470/764499fa873462aa88256af5007335d6?OpenDocument">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/09/23/why-some-lawyers-and-their-clients-are-reluctant-to-engage-appellate-counsel-part-2-its-just-litigation/comment-page-1/#comment-5245</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/?p=1139#comment-5245</guid>
		<description>I think part of the challenge is that litigators often believe that they can handle any form of litigation, whether it&#039;s healthcare, intellectual property, entertainment, etc.  The legal world is increasingly specialized, and litigators of all types must come to grip with that fact, whether civil or criminal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think part of the challenge is that litigators often believe that they can handle any form of litigation, whether it&#8217;s healthcare, intellectual property, entertainment, etc.  The legal world is increasingly specialized, and litigators of all types must come to grip with that fact, whether civil or criminal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

