<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Disregard for Fiduciary Duties that is &#8220;Without Precedent&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/07/15/a-disregard-for-fiduciary-duties-that-is-without-precedent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/07/15/a-disregard-for-fiduciary-duties-that-is-without-precedent/</link>
	<description>Appellate Attorney Greg May on Practice and Developments in the Appellate Courts of California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:33:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/07/15/a-disregard-for-fiduciary-duties-that-is-without-precedent/comment-page-1/#comment-2978</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/?p=919#comment-2978</guid>
		<description>Mr. Pagkas could have made this a brilliant strategy rather than making himself a footnote in legal history and blackening his name forever with one simple change.  After buying the right to the default judgment, go to Ed Mumbert and offer to file a notice of satisfaction in exchange for dropping the malpractice action and the appeal.  The client is then undamaged by the alleged failures, no one owes anyone anything, and the attorney is out the money he paid for the rights to the damage award.  But how much money would it be worth not to have his name forever associated with an unprecedented breach of professional ethics?  Poor guy.  This is a wooden stake in the heart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Pagkas could have made this a brilliant strategy rather than making himself a footnote in legal history and blackening his name forever with one simple change.  After buying the right to the default judgment, go to Ed Mumbert and offer to file a notice of satisfaction in exchange for dropping the malpractice action and the appeal.  The client is then undamaged by the alleged failures, no one owes anyone anything, and the attorney is out the money he paid for the rights to the damage award.  But how much money would it be worth not to have his name forever associated with an unprecedented breach of professional ethics?  Poor guy.  This is a wooden stake in the heart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
