New Trial Motions after Summary Judgment

Can you move for a new trial when your case was disposed of by summary judgment?  This question undoubtedly causes some degree of cognitive dissonance in many lawyers: a new trial when there was no trial?

But the answer is “yes.”

A reminder comes in the form of Doe v. United Airlines, case no. B192865 (2d Dist. Mar. 20, 2008).  After United successfully moved for summary judgment, Doe moved for a new trial on the ground of “newly discovered evidence” that purportedly raised a triable issue of fact precluding summary judgment.

Not that it ultimately did her any good.  The court of appeal holds that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the new trial motion and affirms on plaintiff’s protective cross-appeal from the grant of summary judgment.

There are lots of post-trial and appellate tidbits in this case.  Nothing new, just well-established principles for which the case provides a reminder.  I’ll probably be putting up separate posts on them (or consolidate them into a new post) in the next few days.

Bookmark and Share
3 Responses to New Trial Motions after Summary Judgment
  1. Joe Norman
    March 21, 2008 | 1:37 pm

    SUMMARY JUDGMENT might well be un Constutional. Read this link and think about it.

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=886363

Trackbacks/Pingbacks
  1. Is Summary Judgment Unconstitutional? | The California Blog of Appeal
  2. Appellate Surprises | The California Blog of Appeal
Leave a Reply


Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Trackback URL http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/03/20/new-trial-motions-after-summary-judgment/trackback/
Blog Proprietor
Click on the logo below or on the link in the navigation bar for more information about:

This blog is brought to you exclusively by attorney Greg May. The information offered here is provided as commentary only. It is not legal advice and should not be relied on as such.

View Greg May's profile on LinkedIn

Follow gregmay on Twitter