<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Expert Witness Fees May Not Be Awarded Under Private Attorney General Statute</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/02/28/expert-witness-fees-may-not-be-awarded-under-private-attorney-general-statute/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/02/28/expert-witness-fees-may-not-be-awarded-under-private-attorney-general-statute/</link>
	<description>Appellate Attorney Greg May on Practice and Developments in the Appellate Courts of California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:25:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Another Private AG Fees Case Headed for the Supremes? &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/02/28/expert-witness-fees-may-not-be-awarded-under-private-attorney-general-statute/comment-page-1/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Private AG Fees Case Headed for the Supremes? &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/02/28/expert-witness-fees-may-not-be-awarded-under-private-attorney-general-statute/#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>[...] Expert Witness Fees May Not Be Awarded Under Private Attorney General Statute  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Expert Witness Fees May Not Be Awarded Under Private Attorney General Statute  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

