<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Televised Coverage and More Regarding Supreme Court Marriage Cases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/02/13/televised-coverage-and-more-regarding-supreme-court-marriage-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/02/13/televised-coverage-and-more-regarding-supreme-court-marriage-cases/</link>
	<description>Appellate Attorney Greg May on Practice and Developments in the Appellate Courts of California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:25:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/02/13/televised-coverage-and-more-regarding-supreme-court-marriage-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 02:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/02/13/televised-coverage-and-more-regarding-supreme-court-marriage-cases/#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>Any predicions as to what the ruling will be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any predicions as to what the ruling will be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Correction re: Live Coverage of Marriage Cases Oral Argument - Correction &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/02/13/televised-coverage-and-more-regarding-supreme-court-marriage-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-1135</link>
		<dc:creator>Correction re: Live Coverage of Marriage Cases Oral Argument - Correction &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/02/13/televised-coverage-and-more-regarding-supreme-court-marriage-cases/#comment-1135</guid>
		<description>[...] Comments Stephen Ehat on Televised Coverage and More Regarding Supreme Court Marriage CasesSelf-Represented Attorney May Not Recover Fees on Anti-SLAPP Motion &#124; The California Blog of Appeal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Comments Stephen Ehat on Televised Coverage and More Regarding Supreme Court Marriage CasesSelf-Represented Attorney May Not Recover Fees on Anti-SLAPP Motion | The California Blog of Appeal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Ehat</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/02/13/televised-coverage-and-more-regarding-supreme-court-marriage-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-1134</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Ehat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/02/13/televised-coverage-and-more-regarding-supreme-court-marriage-cases/#comment-1134</guid>
		<description>Your site, http://snipurl.com/20j75  [www_calblogofappeal_com], erroneously states that &quot;oral argument . . . will be televised on the California Channel shortly after they are heard on on March 4.&quot;  The feed is live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your site, <a href="http://snipurl.com/20j75" rel="nofollow">http://snipurl.com/20j75</a>  [www_calblogofappeal_com], erroneously states that &#8220;oral argument . . . will be televised on the California Channel shortly after they are heard on on March 4.&#8221;  The feed is live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

