<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybe It&#8217;s Not OK to Strip Search a 13-year-old Girl for Ibuprofen After All</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/01/31/maybe-its-not-ok-to-strip-search-a-13-year-old-girl-for-ibuprofen-after-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/01/31/maybe-its-not-ok-to-strip-search-a-13-year-old-girl-for-ibuprofen-after-all/</link>
	<description>Appellate Attorney Greg May on Practice and Developments in the Appellate Courts of California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:25:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Supremes Grant Cert in Teen Student Strip Search Case &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/01/31/maybe-its-not-ok-to-strip-search-a-13-year-old-girl-for-ibuprofen-after-all/comment-page-1/#comment-5532</link>
		<dc:creator>Supremes Grant Cert in Teen Student Strip Search Case &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2008/01/31/maybe-its-not-ok-to-strip-search-a-13-year-old-girl-for-ibuprofen-after-all/#comment-5532</guid>
		<description>[...] I covered the original decision upholding the search here, noted the grant of rehearing here, and the en banc reversal here.  Here&#8217;s the en banc opinion: Redding v. Safford USD #1, case [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I covered the original decision upholding the search here, noted the grant of rehearing here, and the en banc reversal here.  Here&#8217;s the en banc opinion: Redding v. Safford USD #1, case [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

