<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Medical Marijuana Buzz . . . and Writ Standing, Too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/11/29/medical-marijuana-buzz-and-writ-standing-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/11/29/medical-marijuana-buzz-and-writ-standing-too/</link>
	<description>Appellate Attorney Greg May on Practice and Developments in the Appellate Courts of California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 03:28:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick Simpson Cannabis</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/11/29/medical-marijuana-buzz-and-writ-standing-too/comment-page-1/#comment-5515</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Simpson Cannabis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/11/29/medical-marijuana-buzz-and-writ-standing-too/#comment-5515</guid>
		<description>personally, I think if you are going to have a law on the books that allows for the medical use of marijuana . . . then it should be un-lawful to terminate employment because of it.

Its like being prescribed codeine, then loosing your job because you chose to follow the doctors orders.

Just doesn&#039;t make sense.

Great Post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>personally, I think if you are going to have a law on the books that allows for the medical use of marijuana . . . then it should be un-lawful to terminate employment because of it.</p>
<p>Its like being prescribed codeine, then loosing your job because you chose to follow the doctors orders.</p>
<p>Just doesn&#8217;t make sense.</p>
<p>Great Post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You Can Still Be Fired for Marijuana Use &#8212; Even if It&#8217;s Medical Marijuana &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/11/29/medical-marijuana-buzz-and-writ-standing-too/comment-page-1/#comment-1033</link>
		<dc:creator>You Can Still Be Fired for Marijuana Use &#8212; Even if It&#8217;s Medical Marijuana &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/11/29/medical-marijuana-buzz-and-writ-standing-too/#comment-1033</guid>
		<description>[...] As expected, Alex Coolman at Drug Law Blog is all over today&#8217;s Supreme Court decision in Ross v. Raginwire Telecommunications, Inc., case no. S138130 (Jan. 24, 2008), in which the divided Supremes hold that the Compassionate Use Act, which decriminalized medical use of marijuana, does not preclude an employer from terminating an employee for such use. Coolman&#8217;s analysis is detailed, and includes YouTube video of portions of the oral argument and commentary on the tension created with City of Garden Grove v. Superior Court, which I blogged about here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As expected, Alex Coolman at Drug Law Blog is all over today&#8217;s Supreme Court decision in Ross v. Raginwire Telecommunications, Inc., case no. S138130 (Jan. 24, 2008), in which the divided Supremes hold that the Compassionate Use Act, which decriminalized medical use of marijuana, does not preclude an employer from terminating an employee for such use. Coolman&#8217;s analysis is detailed, and includes YouTube video of portions of the oral argument and commentary on the tension created with City of Garden Grove v. Superior Court, which I blogged about here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

