<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vindictive Prosecution Dismissal Gets De Novo Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/09/25/vindictive-prosecution-dismissal-gets-de-novo-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/09/25/vindictive-prosecution-dismissal-gets-de-novo-review/</link>
	<description>Appellate Attorney Greg May on Practice and Developments in the Appellate Courts of California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:25:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why Some Lawyers and Their Clients are Reluctant to Engage Appellate Counsel, Part 2: &#8220;It&#8217;s Just Litigation.&#8221; &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/09/25/vindictive-prosecution-dismissal-gets-de-novo-review/comment-page-1/#comment-5243</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Some Lawyers and Their Clients are Reluctant to Engage Appellate Counsel, Part 2: &#8220;It&#8217;s Just Litigation.&#8221; &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/09/25/vindictive-prosecution-dismissal-gets-de-novo-review/#comment-5243</guid>
		<description>[...] or because the applicable standard for a given judgment has not been established (such as here, here, or here, for example).  If it were really simple all the time, would there be a book on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] or because the applicable standard for a given judgment has not been established (such as here, here, or here, for example).  If it were really simple all the time, would there be a book on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Something Fishy about the &#8220;Smell Test&#8221; and the Standard of Review &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/09/25/vindictive-prosecution-dismissal-gets-de-novo-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1170</link>
		<dc:creator>Something Fishy about the &#8220;Smell Test&#8221; and the Standard of Review &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 23:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/09/25/vindictive-prosecution-dismissal-gets-de-novo-review/#comment-1170</guid>
		<description>[...] States v. Jenkins, case no. 06-50049 (9th Cir. Mar. 4, 2008). I blogged about the panel decision in this post because the decision resolved an open issue on the standard of review to apply when reviewing an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] States v. Jenkins, case no. 06-50049 (9th Cir. Mar. 4, 2008). I blogged about the panel decision in this post because the decision resolved an open issue on the standard of review to apply when reviewing an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carrie neighbors</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/09/25/vindictive-prosecution-dismissal-gets-de-novo-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1014</link>
		<dc:creator>carrie neighbors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/09/25/vindictive-prosecution-dismissal-gets-de-novo-review/#comment-1014</guid>
		<description>I and my husband are vindictive prosecution victims. We own a business called the Yellow House store. We have been victimized for nearly 3 years.  Our case is still making its way through the courts. Our next court date is in 2 weeks. We will prevail in this fight! Police and prosecutors should not be able to conspire together to ruin peoples lives like this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I and my husband are vindictive prosecution victims. We own a business called the Yellow House store. We have been victimized for nearly 3 years.  Our case is still making its way through the courts. Our next court date is in 2 weeks. We will prevail in this fight! Police and prosecutors should not be able to conspire together to ruin peoples lives like this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

