<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study of Sanctions in Appellate Proceedings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/08/22/study-of-sanctions-in-appellate-proceedings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/08/22/study-of-sanctions-in-appellate-proceedings/</link>
	<description>Appellate Attorney Greg May on Practice and Developments in the Appellate Courts of California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 03:28:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rare Frivolous Appeal Sanction Levied &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/08/22/study-of-sanctions-in-appellate-proceedings/comment-page-1/#comment-943</link>
		<dc:creator>Rare Frivolous Appeal Sanction Levied &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 09:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/08/22/study-of-sanctions-in-appellate-proceedings/#comment-943</guid>
		<description>[...] few months ago, I told you how a study by Ben Shatz and Joanne Sweeny in Whittier Law Review disclosed just how rarely [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few months ago, I told you how a study by Ben Shatz and Joanne Sweeny in Whittier Law Review disclosed just how rarely [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

