http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/08/01/en-banc-ninth-circuit-resolves-intra-circuit-split-on-standard-of-review-in-confrontation-clause-challenges/ Appellate Attorney Greg May on Practice and Developments in the Appellate Courts of California Thu, 26 Jan 2012 16:25:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/08/01/en-banc-ninth-circuit-resolves-intra-circuit-split-on-standard-of-review-in-confrontation-clause-challenges/comment-page-1/#comment-1147 What the Heck IS “Abuse of Discretion,” Anyway? | The California Blog of Appeal Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:16:31 +0000 http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/08/01/en-banc-ninth-circuit-resolves-intra-circuit-split-on-standard-of-review-in-confrontation-clause-challenges/#comment-1147 [...] something it isn’t. (I wrote about the difficulty the Ninth Circuit had in one case last year here, witha related post here and an announcement of my article on the topic [...] [...] something it isn’t. (I wrote about the difficulty the Ninth Circuit had in one case last year here, witha related post here and an announcement of my article on the topic [...]

]]> http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/08/01/en-banc-ninth-circuit-resolves-intra-circuit-split-on-standard-of-review-in-confrontation-clause-challenges/comment-page-1/#comment-930 Article Published in Daily Journal re: Standardf of Review in Confrontation Clause Appeals | The California Blog of Appeal Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:41:31 +0000 http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/08/01/en-banc-ninth-circuit-resolves-intra-circuit-split-on-standard-of-review-in-confrontation-clause-challenges/#comment-930 [...] Clause challenges based on limitations on cross-examination. The article (PDF link) grew out of this blog post giving my initial impressions about the case on the day it was published. I followed up that post [...] [...] Clause challenges based on limitations on cross-examination. The article (PDF link) grew out of this blog post giving my initial impressions about the case on the day it was published. I followed up that post [...]

]]> http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/08/01/en-banc-ninth-circuit-resolves-intra-circuit-split-on-standard-of-review-in-confrontation-clause-challenges/comment-page-1/#comment-814 Welcome to all Los Angeles Daily Journal Readers | The California Blog of Appeal Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:15:11 +0000 http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/08/01/en-banc-ninth-circuit-resolves-intra-circuit-split-on-standard-of-review-in-confrontation-clause-challenges/#comment-814 [...] for Confrontation Clause clause challenges based on limits placed on cross-examination — here and here.  The article in the Daily Journal is behind their subscription wall online, so grab [...] [...] for Confrontation Clause clause challenges based on limits placed on cross-examination — here and here.  The article in the Daily Journal is behind their subscription wall online, so grab [...]

]]> http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/08/01/en-banc-ninth-circuit-resolves-intra-circuit-split-on-standard-of-review-in-confrontation-clause-challenges/comment-page-1/#comment-618 Vindictive Prosecution Dismissal Gets De Novo Review | The California Blog of Appeal Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:03:19 +0000 http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/08/01/en-banc-ninth-circuit-resolves-intra-circuit-split-on-standard-of-review-in-confrontation-clause-challenges/#comment-618 [...] in confrontation clause challenges based on limitations on cross-examination, which I blogged about here and here. Both cases involved an unsettled question regarding the standard of review in a criminal [...] [...] in confrontation clause challenges based on limitations on cross-examination, which I blogged about here and here. Both cases involved an unsettled question regarding the standard of review in a criminal [...]

]]> http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/08/01/en-banc-ninth-circuit-resolves-intra-circuit-split-on-standard-of-review-in-confrontation-clause-challenges/comment-page-1/#comment-472 Tami Cowden Mon, 06 Aug 2007 07:08:37 +0000 http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/08/01/en-banc-ninth-circuit-resolves-intra-circuit-split-on-standard-of-review-in-confrontation-clause-challenges/#comment-472 I'm glad I'm apparently not the only one who went "huh?" after reading that passage. I agree, the language is definitely confusing. I’m glad I’m apparently not the only one who went “huh?” after reading that passage. I agree, the language is definitely confusing.

]]> http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/08/01/en-banc-ninth-circuit-resolves-intra-circuit-split-on-standard-of-review-in-confrontation-clause-challenges/comment-page-1/#comment-462 More on U.S. v. Larson | The California Blog of Appeal Fri, 03 Aug 2007 19:33:51 +0000 http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/08/01/en-banc-ninth-circuit-resolves-intra-circuit-split-on-standard-of-review-in-confrontation-clause-challenges/#comment-462 [...] few days ago, I blogged about the odd reasoning behind the en banc Ninth Circuit’s purported resolution in United [...] [...] few days ago, I blogged about the odd reasoning behind the en banc Ninth Circuit’s purported resolution in United [...]

]]>