<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Premature Appeal Saved &#8212; Should it Be?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/06/19/another-saved-appeal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/06/19/another-saved-appeal/</link>
	<description>Appellate Attorney Greg May on Practice and Developments in the Appellate Courts of California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 03:28:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flexibility on Appellate Jurisdiction &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/06/19/another-saved-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-3358</link>
		<dc:creator>Flexibility on Appellate Jurisdiction &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/06/19/another-saved-appeal/#comment-3358</guid>
		<description>[...] of California appellate courts to &#8220;save&#8221; appeals through various devices, such as a generous construction of the notice of appeal, or treating an appeal from a non-appealable order as a writ petition.  In fact, these devices are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of California appellate courts to &#8220;save&#8221; appeals through various devices, such as a generous construction of the notice of appeal, or treating an appeal from a non-appealable order as a writ petition.  In fact, these devices are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Compare and Contrast: Virginia and California &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/06/19/another-saved-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>Compare and Contrast: Virginia and California &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/06/19/another-saved-appeal/#comment-999</guid>
		<description>[...] order as a notice from an appealable order or from the ensuing judgment (which I blogged about here) or even construing the appeal as a petition for a writ of mandate (which I blogged about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] order as a notice from an appealable order or from the ensuing judgment (which I blogged about here) or even construing the appeal as a petition for a writ of mandate (which I blogged about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Doctrine of Implied Findings is Serious Business &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/06/19/another-saved-appeal/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>The Doctrine of Implied Findings is Serious Business &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 18:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calblogofappeal.com/2007/06/19/another-saved-appeal/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] nature of the appeal.  You&#8217;ll recall I posted about &#8220;saving&#8221; premature appeals here, wondering whether the practice might someday be challenged in the Supreme Court.  The Appellate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] nature of the appeal.  You&#8217;ll recall I posted about &#8220;saving&#8221; premature appeals here, wondering whether the practice might someday be challenged in the Supreme Court.  The Appellate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

